“It is a monstrosity, and why is that necessary?” asked Steven County rancher Scott Nielsen, a member of the county association and president of the Cattle Producers of Washington. “It’s a lot of what concerns and scares us. Why can’t they just say, ‘Grazing can continue in the forest’?”

Don Jenkins

Capital Press


Ranchers: Colville National Forest plan too big to corral

Ranchers in northeast Washington have identified what they call a “fatal flaw” in the Forest Service’s plan to manage the Colville National Forest: No one can be expected to understand it.

The plan and supporting documents run thousands of pages, notes Chance Gowan, a consultant for the Stevens County Cattlemen’s Association. He says he’s dedicated well over 40 hours studying the materials and “sadly” reports being sure he’s missed something harmful to cattlemen.

“It is a monstrosity, and why is that necessary?” asked Steven County rancher Scott Nielsen, a member of the county association and president of the Cattle Producers of Washington. “It’s a lot of what concerns and scares us. Why can’t they just say, ‘Grazing can continue in the forest’?”

The cattlemen’s association and about two dozen other organizations, including many environmental groups, have formally objected to the Forest Service’s long-range plan to manage 1.1 million acres in Stevens, Ferry and Pend Oreille counties. The plan, released in September, will provide “overall guidance” for how cattlemen can use the forest’s 58 grazing allotments.

The plan also will affect logging, mining and recreation.

The plan recommends that Congress designate 61,700 acres as wilderness. The Forest Service says grazing will continue at current levels. Stevens County cattlemen and the Washington Cattlemen’s Association, however, say restrictions on new roads and power tools could make grazing impractical. Both groups also are concerned that new grass-height standards near water would reduce the number of cattle on the land and shorten grazing seasons.

Before getting to all that, Gowan’s written comments to the Forest Service  criticized the plan’s volume and organization.

References to grazing and other activities are woven throughout the 38-page draft record of decision, 236-page management plan and 1,496-page environmental impact statement. Supporting documents include 527 pages from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on endangered species and 263 pages from the Forest Service assessing the plan’s biological affects.

Gowan argued that the material was too complex and cumbersome, and practically speaking failed to give the public the chance to comment. “We assert that this plan, as written does not offer that opportunity,” he wrote.

Colville National Forest spokesman Franklin Pemberton agreed there is a lot of material to absorb, but the forest covers a lot of ground.

“It’s a plan for 1.1 million acres, with the scientific references and all the working documents, it has to be that long. There are other folks who say we haven’t done enough analysis,” he said. “It’s a big document for sure, but the record of decision (38 pages) is the important piece.”

The period to object to the plan ended Nov. 6. The Forest Service says it will hold public meetings to try to resolve the objections before finalizing the plan.

Environmental groups object that the plan doesn’t explicitly reduce livestock grazing. They also wanted forest managers to recommend more acres be designated as wilderness.

Continue reading here

____________________________________________________________________________

Please support our non-profit, independent news.

OUR ONLY SPECIAL INTEREST IS FREEDOM

 

 

Comments

  1. This is the right blog for everyone who hopes to find
    out about this topic. You know a whole lot its almost tough to argue with you
    (not that I personally would want to…HaHa).
    You definitely put a fresh spin on a topic that’s been written about for
    ages. Excellent stuff, just excellent!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.